My hubris weighs a ton.
... and it's not for the reasons you might think.
Published on December 6, 2003 By Public Display Of Invective In Politics
I came across Draginol's article regarding the left's blinding hatred of our esteemed President today, and decided that it would be necessary to toss in my two coppers. I'm not really going to address his particular article specifically, as his article was simply the impetus for my considering my dislike for our President. I'd rather begin my stint here as a neophyte blogger as politely as possible.
I think a little bit of information about myself will help in putting my opinions in the proper perspective. I apologize in advance for any run-on sentences or poor grammar, as I am watching TV while I do this, and this is simply to get some ideas down on virtual paper.
I grew up in North Carolina, son of a larger-than-small business owner and farmer in a moderately well-to-do family. Southern Baptist from the day my mother brought me home from the hospital, I wouldn't exactly categorize myself as the prototypical leftist. In fact, throughout my adolescence and young adulthood, I was known quite infamously throughout not only my high school and the surrounding areas as quite the antithesis thereof. My parents were co-chairpeople of the Franklin County Republican party, and remained quite active within the party until my father's health began to falter. A great cause of this failing health was a direct result of his 50+ years of heavy smoking (although I am quite sure that the major tobacco companies would disagree vehemently on that bit of information).
In addition to being quite politically conservative from the womb, I discovered a love of the political discourse (or what at that time I mistook for political discourse) and became a formidable debater and enormous fan of conservative national personalities such as Rush Limbaugh and Pat Buchanan, and an ardent supporter of all things Republican, whether right or wrong. In retrospect, I honestly believed that the conservative rhetoric more than compensated for any behavioral gaffes, e.g. Iran Contra, Watergate, etc., that may or may have not been perpetuated by said political animals.
I graduated from high school with a stellar academic record (ranked 7th if I remember correctly) in my class, and also a letterman in two sports, as well as having earned my Eagle rank in the Boy Scouts of America. While in the Boy Scouts and living on a farm my whole life, I gained a deep respect for both small farmers and ecological conservation. Was I a tree-hugger or enviro-nazi? No... just a God-fearing Southern boy who loved being able to wake up in the morning and take a deep lungful of wonderfully sweet North Carolina fescue-tinged air.
Having applied to numerous colleges and universities, I decided upon Duke University as my future educational facility and while there, proceeded to study political science and history, economics and German, philosophy and religion with a vengance. In fact, once I got to college, I began to realize through my own reading (certainly not through the prescribed reading by my professors) that there was a whole new world of worldly perspective out there. Contrary to much of what I had heard on Rush's show, for example, at least at Duke University, the education was surprisingly conservative and decidedly traditional. Had I relied on only my educational materials for my classes, my perspective most likely would have remained much as it had before... reactionary, conservative, and Republican.
However, during my junior year in college, I moved to Berlin, Germany for a semester program abroad. A new world opened before my eyes, and my perspective on world events and history grew and developed at an almost meteoric rate. Needless to say, my views started to change in favor of a more cosmopolitan and worldly view. Does that mean that I became a pabulum-puking liberal, as Morton Downey, Jr. so eloquently described? (thank you for correcting me, Anthony R. However, next time, do you think you could offer some constructive criticism, or is that perhaps a little too far beyond your intellectual capacity?) Quite the opposite, actually. In fact, if it weren't for my Christian background and my belief in the teachings of Christ that, first and foremost, one is to love his neighbor as himself, I would probably have become a cold-hearted asshole. Instead, I became a warm-hearted asshole. Just kidding.
Anyway, throughout this time, my dad was getting sicker, and even though he is a veteran of Korea (you remember Korea, the war that really wasn't a war?) and fought proudly for his country in the Army and always paid his taxes, he was turned away for aid through the VA. To compound matters, he was also declined for disablity benefits, even though he was rightfully entitled to those benefits.
Due to my father's health, my family moved west to Texas while I was still in college. This happened to be in 1996. Throughout my stint in Germany, my folks lived in Texas. And let me tell you, being that my parents had been lifetime Republicans, when they finally arrived to the "Republican paradise" that is Texas, they were sorely disappointed. This brings me to the whole reason for this submittal to my blog. I graduated from Duke University in the spring of 1998, and promptly moved out to Texas to be with my family.
Much of what we all heard about Texas during the 2000 campaign regarding all of the wonderful changes and improvements to the Lone Star state was simply... well, let me just call it what it was... Bullshit. The educational advances that had supposedly occured? Didn't happen. The improvements in the ecological situation in Texas? Nonexistent. The reduction in the real tax rate on everyday Joe Texan? Never came to pass. In fact, on pretty much every issue and "victory" that Bush proposed as a feather in his proverbial resume cap, he was lying. For exact numbers, I could sit here and crib from numerous reports and studies and books that have been authored. That isn't the intent of this article. To be honest, Molly Ivins is much more articulate than I am, and certainly a hell of a lot funnier. Instead, the intent behind this article is simply to let you know how it felt on the ground, as we were living it, before any numbers or articles or studies had been done. Having just graduated from college, and being a pretty sharp guy as politics and economics is concerned as well as having been raised to be extremely politically conservative, it felt like somebody (Bush) was lying to the world, and using our pitiful economic and social situation in Texas as reasoning for putting Bush in power. We felt betrayed with regards to our support and our beliefs.
Now don't get me wrong. Bush, I'm sure, is a nice guy. He doesn't really want to hurt anybody. If only he knew what his policies, or the policies of his appointees and underlings were ACTUALLY doing, things would be different. The problem with this is simply that it's bullshit as well. First, that sort of thinking is precisely the type mental exercize that your average German citizen under the Nazis enganged in. Am I comparing Bush to the Nazis? No. What I am doing is simply illustrating how a people under stress will dupe themselves into justifying or explaning away something that doesn't quite fit into what they have come to believe. Actually, most people who know the Bush family in Texas know that Dubya is a spiteful, spoiled brat who is a complete asshole. Now granted, this is heresay, as I don't personally know George W. Bush. But I know what he says in public. I know what the realities on the ground in Texas are for a middle class family (not just my own, might I add). And I know personally quite a few people who have had a number of dealings with Bush personally whose opinions I value highly.
So to recap. Why do I dislike Bush? Simple. He lies, he holds others to standards to which he won't hold himself, and he lies. He lies, he lies, he lies. And that flies in the face of everything I was ever taught as a Christian.
In case anyone is wondering, this is off the top of my head, without any preplanning. SO if you have a problem with my line of reasoning, I'll clean it up and add some more flesh to this, as well as do some editing in the near future. I just wanted to respond. Let me know what you think?
Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Dec 06, 2003
Pabulum puking liberal is actually a Morton Downey JR statement... Get it right.
on Dec 07, 2003
Kind of rambling.
on Dec 07, 2003
Please allow me to let you in on a little well kept secret. I hope you won't tell anyone about this because, it really is something that many Americans just don't know. Ok, you promise to keep this under your hat? I'll go ahead and let you in on it so that you will be one of the enlightened few who have this knowledge and you should feel very good and much more informed now that you are armed with this powerful ammo. Ok... Are you ready? Here it is...They all lie! There has never been anyone in the oval office that hasn't ever told a lie and there never will be.
Now that we have that settled, lets not forget to all head out to the polls this November and vote our beloved president, George W. Bush back in for another four years. GCJ
on Dec 07, 2003
Nooooooo, NOT another 4 years! God forbid!!
on Dec 07, 2003
GemCityJoe,
You are so right!! Love your rebuttal!

And as for you, Mr. NC-Southern Baptist-Duke Educated Person, where do you get off being so meanspirited and so Un-Christ like, the model you grew up with? And as for a president, hey, you gotta love a guy who cuts his own wood with a chainsaw and loves a good bar-b-que despite his political affiliation.
on Dec 07, 2003
Mean-spirited? Wow... I guess you haven't listened to anything Ann Coulter or Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh or G. Gordon Liddy or Jim Quinn (the list goes on and on) have had to say about anything and anyone who doesn't fit into their narrow view of the world. If you haven't, I suggest you start. The shrillness of their attacks, their inability to refrain from ad hominem attacks, or to be inttellectually honest with their arguments is disturbing, not to mention completely inappropriate in most circumstances. Oh, and just for the record, I'm no longer a Southern Baptist.
on Dec 07, 2003
And GemCityJoe... so just because they all lie (which I would submit is a falsehood), that means we should accept it as par for the course and the cost of having "free and open political discourse"? Well, to be fair, I don't know every elected official in Washington, nor do I know any former or current presidents personally. So I don't know if any of them tell the truth, either. My point is, if you're right, and all of the people whom we have seen fit to elect are, in fact, liars, then why do we continue to re-elect them? If it is simply because you don't believe one person can make a difference, then perhaps you should temper your cynicism a bit. If you are just trying to vote for a winner, then all I can do is point to Nazi Germany as an example of how that can be a seriously bad idea. (and no, I'm not comparing the Republicans or the Democrats to the Nazis... simply pointing out how that particular type of thinking can lead somewhere no one wants to go) We all one have vote, one voice, even if the cards are stacked against us in the form of corporate funding of elections and a severe lack of statesmen to elect. I personally voted for Ralph Nader last election, and will do so again should he decide to run. Otherwise, I could see myself voting for McCain, so long as he doesn't get knocked out of the race due to dubious push polls asserting some negative but false aspect of his personal history. If that means that I am "throwing away my vote", so be it. But I will be able to look at myself in the mirror the day after election day.
on Dec 07, 2003
By the way, as a response to Patty O, I try to vote for someone based on their political views and their record instead of their taste for Texas barbeque (which is wonderful, might I add) or their outdoor activities (not that I liked Reagan, either, but he cut his wood with an axe).
on Dec 07, 2003
>>>next time, do you think you could offer some constructive criticism, or is that perhaps a little too far beyond your intellectual capacity?>>>

This passage is even more entertaining than Sanity from the left’s political intransigence. I read and pointed the article, this is entertaining stuff.
on Dec 07, 2003
Interesting, especially considering I was a die-hard Republican until I actually started comparing the rhetoric of both sides to reality. The problem with your assumption about me being "from the left" is that I don't like the Dems any more than I like Republicans. In fact, I think they are both rotten to the core from corporate largesse. As far as intransigence is concerned, I was unaware that included changing one's mind in the face of undeniable fact.
on Dec 07, 2003
"Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one --Thomas Paine "
on Dec 08, 2003
Unfortunately, too many people on the right AND left forget that while government is, indeed evil, it is, more than anything else, necessary. When Paine wrote that, it is important to keep in mind that the primary danger for liberty and civil rights was tyranny by the government, perpetuated against its citizenry. Now, however, we face an altogether different set of circumstances under which the most pointed and manifest danger resides in the existence of the immortal corporation, whose structure and practices are severely antithetical to the democratic principles which we in this country supposedly hold so dear. Therefore, while Paine was absolutely correct in his comment regarding government and its role, he had never seen such an animal as a corporation with billions of dollars worth of income, millions upon millions in free cash, and the ability to, by itself, push legislation through be sheer force of will.
on Dec 08, 2003
"What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them." --Thomas Jefferson to William Stephens Smith, 1787. ME 6:373, Papers 12:356
on Dec 08, 2003
"God forbid we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion... We have had thirteen States independent for eleven years. There has been one rebellion. That comes to one rebellion in a century and a half, for each State. What country before ever existed a century and a half without a rebellion?" --Thomas Jefferson to William S. Smith, 1787. ME 6:372
on Jan 11, 2004
dude, BUSH IS THE ANTI-CHRIST! and i'm not just saying that. if you want proof then read the bible and especially in revelations
2 Pages1 2